Big decisions deserve
more than one opinion.
Multiple LLMs reason independently. Consense compares their reasoning and gives you one clear recommendation, showing where they agree, disagree, and what could change the answer.
Independent perspectives from
Each model reasons independently: no model sees another's answer before submitting its own. Consense compares what they came up with after the fact.
This is Pro's panel. Free uses a faster, lighter lineup from the same four labs.
One question. One clear verdict.
This is the actual verdict format, not a mockup of the interface but the interface itself.
Take the startup role, with conditions.
3 of 4 models recommend accepting
⚠ Where they split
Claude weighs runway risk more heavily; GPT and Gemini place greater weight on career upside.
◐ What would change this answer
Less than 12 months of runway, or materially worse equity terms.
This is the real verdict format. Ask your own question ↑
How Consense works
Ask once
Ask the decision exactly as you normally would.
Models reason independently
Leading AI models analyze the same question without seeing each other's answers.
Consense finds the signal
Consense compares positions, disagreements, risks and assumptions, then produces one auditable verdict.
Why not just ask one AI?
One model can sound certain and still be wrong. Consense makes disagreement visible before you act.
Decisions worth a second opinion
Career
Business
Technology
Money
Education
Everyday
Four ways to analyze a decision
Consensus is all most decisions need. Go deeper when the stakes justify it.
Consensus
Get the answer. Models reason independently; Consense identifies the shared conclusion.
Debate
Stress-test the answer. Models read and challenge each other's reasoning before producing a revised verdict.
Confidence typically shifts once models respond to each other's blind spots.
Judge
Find the strongest argument. Answers are evaluated for reasoning quality, assumptions, and rigor.
Advisory Board
See the decision from different angles. Models take complementary roles to surface opportunities, risks, and trade-offs.
Don't just trust the verdict. Inspect it.
Independent reasoning
Panelists answer before seeing one another's responses.
Disagreement exposed
Consense doesn't hide minority opinions just to produce a cleaner answer.
Every answer available
Expand any model to read its complete reasoning.
Uncertainty made explicit
See confidence, model alignment, and what information could change the recommendation.
Confidence that explains itself. Consense weighs how strongly the panel's reasoning supports the verdict (model alignment, consistency, and the type of decision), then checks that against how similar past verdicts actually turned out. It isn't a guarantee of correctness; it's a signal for how cautiously to treat the recommendation.
Share the reasoning, not just the answer
Every verdict can become a link: the recommendation, the disagreement, the risks, all of it. Easier to send a partner, co-founder, or friend than a two-thousand-word chat transcript, and easier to actually discuss.
Try it free. Upgrade when the decision matters.
- 5 Consensus verdicts / month
- A fast 4-model panel
- Shareable verdicts
- Unlimited verdicts (fair use)
- The full frontier panel: GPT-5.1, Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3 Pro, DeepSeek Flash
- All modes: Debate, Judge, Advisory Board
Consense for iPhone and Android
The same 4-model panel, verdicts, and history, natively. Currently in development.
Frequently asked
Which AI models does Consense use?+
Pro runs the full frontier panel: GPT-5.1, Claude Opus 4.8, Gemini 3 Pro, and DeepSeek V4 Pro. Free uses a faster, lighter model from each of the same four labs, so the mechanism (independent reasoning, compared) is identical either way. The panel evolves as better models ship; you're never locked into one vendor's blind spots.
Why should I trust multiple AIs more than one?+
Because they don't share blind spots. When independent models reasoning from the same information converge, that's a stronger signal than any one of them sounding confident. When they don't converge, you find out before you act on it, not after.
Can I read each model's original answer?+
Yes. Every verdict includes each model's full response, expandable in place; Consense's summary never replaces the source material.
What does the confidence score mean?+
How strongly the panel's reasoning supports the recommendation, not a probability that it's objectively correct. It factors in model alignment, consistency, and how verifiable the question is.
Do the models influence each other?+
Not in Consensus mode: each model answers independently, with no visibility into what the others said. Debate mode is the exception: it deliberately shows models each other's reasoning so they can challenge it.
What's the difference between Consensus, Debate, Judge, and Advisory Board?+
Consensus merges independent answers into one verdict. Debate has models challenge each other's reasoning. Judge scores each answer for rigor and picks the strongest. Advisory Board assigns complementary roles so different angles surface. Consensus covers most decisions.
Is Consense appropriate for medical, legal, or financial decisions?+
Consense can help you reason through the trade-offs, but it isn't a substitute for a licensed professional; treat every verdict as a second opinion, not a final one, especially where the stakes are that high.
What happens to my questions and data?+
Your question is sent to whichever models are on the panel to generate their answers, and stored so your history and shared links work. We don't sell your data or share it with advertisers; see the full Privacy Policy for exactly what's collected and why.